This is the third of a three-part series sponsored by Samsung involving the use of technology in sports.

I mentioned a few weeks ago that I had the chance to check out ESPN3D when the network demoed it in the press box at the Ohio State-Wisconsin game last month. I explained how it was more impressive than I thought it would be, but it is still something I can live without.

Let's just say the gap between Standard Definition and High Definition is way greater than the gap between High Definition and 3D.

But in the last few weeks I have thought more and more about how the introduction of 3D will impact sports. I'm not talking about how it will impact those watching the games on television. I'm talking about how it will actually affect the games.

Think about how much high definition has affected instant replay across a number of sports. Can 3D television make it even easier to determine if a player's foot was inbounds?

Continue reading this post »

This is the second of a three-part series sponsored by Samsung involving the use of technology in sports.

Fifteen years ago -- heck, 10 years ago -- did you ever believe you would be able to watch as many games on one Saturday as you can today?

Between hundreds of channels, subscription packages and games streaming online, you can watch almost any game played at numerous levels of college football every week.

And I haven't even mentioned the impact of the DVR yet.

Every week before I head out to wherever the Badgers are playing, I grab my remote and record the Badger game, the game involving the next Wisconsin opponent and any other meaningful game footage I might have to sift through during the week.

Continue reading this post »

This is the first of a three-part series sponsored by Samsung involving the use of technology in sports.

With all the talk about the BCS Standings this week -- and how they might keep Wisconsin out another BCS bowl game -- we thought we would take a look at the top five reasons why the BCS computer rankings are flawed.

Let's preface this by mentioning that there are a few components of the computer rankings that do work. For instance, strength of schedule is important and should be factored into how good a team is perceived to be.

In addition, the human polls aren't perfect either. One AP voter still has Ohio State ranked seven spots higher than the Badgers, despite Wisconsin beating the Buckeyes two weeks ago. Fortunately, the AP Poll is not factored into the BCS. Unfortunately, the coaches' poll is, despite those coaches spending most of their Saturday worrying about their own team and not watching the other 118 schools that play football.

The whole system is flawed, but I have a big problem with robots determining which schools get to play in the BCS National Championship. With that said, I present to you the top five reasons why a computer should not be telling me who is good at football:

Continue reading this post »