Big Ten Basketball Recruiting Stays Steady As Midwest Talent Pool Rises

Megan McCormick

The Big Ten's reputation as a basketball power has rebounded nicely over the past few seasons. Are conference teams recruiting better as a result?

Coming off a third straight ACC/Big Ten Challenge win and now three teams ranked in the Top 5 of the preseason polls, the Big Ten is considered the premier college basketball conference in the land once again. And like the old chicken-or-the-egg conundrum, it can be hard to tell whether the league's improvement attacted better players or whether more talented recruits raised the Big Ten's level of play. Though I cannot offer a definitive answer, I can try to hit you over the head with a block of basketball recruiting data.

You could trace the Big Ten's recent resurgence back to a bumper crop of talent in the midwest starting back when the vaunted Class of 2007 were freshmen. The class brought in 22 of the top 150 prospects in the country, including six ranked in the Top 40 and two of the Top 25 according to Rivals.com. Those numbers dipped in '08 (3 and 3) and '09 (2 and 1) before the highly-touted 2010 class (7 and 3).

Five newcomers in the 2011 class were ranked among the top 40, including two in the Top 25 (Cody Zeller, Branden Dawson). In 2012, we've seen the "success rate" jump back up, with four of the Top 25 freshman in the country joining the conference: Glenn Robinson III, Sam Dekker, Yogi Ferrell and Gary Harris. A total of five ranked players from the Top 40 and eight from the Top 50 will be on Big Ten rosters.

Looking specifically at Wisconsin, the Badgers have rebounded from a shutout in 2010 to nab a Top 150 player in each of the past two classes.

Fig. 1 - Big Ten Recruits in the Rivals150

School 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Michigan State 4 3 3 2 3 3 18
Purdue 4 0 2 1 2 4 13
Indiana 4* 1 2 5 2 3 17
Michigan 3 2 1 2 0 2 10
Iowa 2 1 0 0 1 0 4
Wisconsin 1 1 0 2 2 2 8
Northwestern 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
Ohio State 0 4 6 0 3 5 18
Illinois 0 4 3 4 0 2 13
Minnesota 0 2 1 2 3 0 8
Penn State 0 0 1 1 0 1 3
Nebraska 0 0 - - - - 0
Total ranked recruits 19* 18 20 19 16 22

*Note: Ron Patterson is included in Indiana's totals since they effectively locked him away from other programs for two full years before cutting him loose.

Of these 19 ranked recruits, only one Michigan 's Nic Staukas) comes form outside the conference's nine-state footprint.

Along with Indiana and Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa have seen an uptick in rated prospects in their respective states, offsetting some below average numbers in other key states in 2012. It will be interesting to see how the state of Wisconsin fares when the 2013 class wraps up, as it appears to be one of the strongest ever in the state's prep history.

Fig. 2 - Regional Players in the Rivals150

State 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Indiana 10 5 6 4 4 8 37
Michigan 6 6 3 3 2 6 26
Pennsylvania 5 3 2 4 3 8 25
Illinois 4 11 9 7 7 7 45
Ohio 3 3 7 1 9 8 31
Wisconsin 3 1 1 3 1 2 11
Iowa 3 2 1 0 2 0 8
Nebraska 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Minnesota 0 1 0 5 2 2 10
Total ranked players 35 32 29 27 30 41

Fig. 2 note: Players who attended prep school hoop factories for only their senior season were counted for their "true" home state. Indiana's Hanner Perea attended La Lumiere Academy for his final two seasons and is included in the state's count. Likewise, Mitch McGary, A.J. Hammons, and DeMarquise Johnson all left midwestern towns to play two or more seasons out of state, so they will not count toward the conference total (ditto for Sir'Dominic Pointer in 2011). Jay Simpson, D'Vauntes Smith-Rivera, Javontae Hawkins, Elijah Macon, Jakarr Sampson, Aaron Thomas and Jamari Traylor were all counted for Big Ten states for this analysis, although only one (Simpson) wound up signing with a league school.

In this second chart you can see how adding Nebraska has really no effect on the rise in talent within the Big Ten footprint. The region has simply been loaded. As a result, we are seeing a resurgence at traditional powers Indiana and Michigan.

Pairing the sets of data, two things immediately jump out:

  1. How totally inept Penn State is in their own backyard. The Nittany Lions are basically an invisible program in a state that is part of the Big Ten's clear upper tier in talent produced.
  2. How truly similar Wisconsin and Minnesota in terms of the states' (un)fertile recruiting grounds and the programs' ability to attract recruits. Which makes Bo Ryan's success compared to the Gophers' results over the last decade even more striking.

The Big Ten is trending upward toward producing more talent within its borders, though not quite to the level of the 2007 class that brought the conference back to prominence. Yet the league is grabbing a smaller percentage of that highly-rated crop.

On the surface, Ohio State and Illinois taking only one player apiece in their 2012 recruiting classes would seem to explain this as an anomaly. But keep in mind the large overall recruiting class sizes in 2010 and 2011 for those schools -- 11 for OSU, 9 for Illinois -- average each other out. We can't glorify the fat years if not also accepting criticism in the lean years. Those two schools are of course connected now that John Groce -- Thad Matta's recruiting ace at OSU -- is the head coach in Champaign.

Fig. 3 - Rivals150 Recruits by Power Conference

Conference Schools 2012 Recruits Recruits/School Rate 2011 Rate 2010 Rate
ACC 12 23 1.91 1.75 2.00
SEC 14 22 1.57 2.08 2.25
Big East 15 21 1.40 2.06 1.63
Big Ten 12 19 1.58 1.50 1.81
Big XII 10 19 1.90 1.25 1.33
Pac-12 12 18 1.50 1.42 1.20

The Big Ten has settled into a groove the last four years or so with the percent of recruits it grabs from the Top 150. The conference annually ranks either third or fourth among the six power conferences in number of Rivals150 signees per league member, almost always behind the SEC and ACC (which are based in more talent-rich areas).

Much of the conference realignment occurred before the 2011 season, while the SEC additions take place this year. It doesn't take a math wizard to know that Texas A&M and Missouri were not hauling in top recruits on the regular, but these numbers confirm that the schools' move helped their former conference (Big XII) and actually dragged down their new league (SEC) in the first year. We covered Nebraska having a marginal negative effect on the Big Ten numbers, which also seems to be the case in a positive direction for the Pac-12's new schools. But that bump is more from Arizona and UCLA reawakening than anything Utah or Colorado brings to the table. The ACC is consistently the best gatherer of Top 150 talent, while the Big East's fall from grace has already begun.

---

Join the Badger conversation on Facebook! Go to our Facebook page and "like" us!

For more Wisconsin basketball coverage, follow Phil on Twitter @hoopsmarinara.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Bucky's 5th Quarter

You must be a member of Bucky's 5th Quarter to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bucky's 5th Quarter. You should read them.

Join Bucky's 5th Quarter

You must be a member of Bucky's 5th Quarter to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bucky's 5th Quarter. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker