Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Where Do The Lakers Go From Here?

B5Q Film Session: Breaking Down Oregon's Zone Read Offense

By now you've probably heard a little about Oregon's "complex" offense. Over the last few days, I've spent a lot of time watching some Oregon film, spending the most time on their win over Stanford and their loss against USC.

After watching the film, I've made some general conclusions:

  1. Oregon's offense isn't as high-powered and daunting as you might think.
  2. It's also not as complex as you might think. The Ducks actually run the same formations and plays a lot, but the players are free to improvise after the snap. A run up the middle out of one formation, might go to the outside out of the very same formation the next time, just because the running back reads the defense that way. But that's what makes it so hard to defend: They keep the defense guessing.
  3. While I'd say Wisconsin's offense is more potent than Oregon's, the Ducks' playmakers are a bad matchup for the Badgers.

Star-divide

The offense is mainly a "zone read" spread offense. This is a term you might be familiar with because Wisconsin has seen these offenses before. Most plays start with quarterback Darron Thomas showing a handoff to the running back (usually LaMichael James or Kenjon Barner). Thomas reads the backside defensive end and makes a decision to either give the running back the ball or keep it himself.

Most of Oregon's running plays are either an "inside zone read" or an "outside zone read". The only difference is where the play is designed to go -- either inside the tackles or outside.

Looking at some older film, the Ducks would actually show whether they were running an outside or inside zone read based on the formation they were in. They did this on purpose to try to get the defense to overload to one side. If the running back was lined up to the side or off-set and slightly in front of the quarterback, then they were running an outside zone read. If the running back was off-set behind the quarterback, then they were running an inside zone read. This seems to have changed this season, specifically recently as Oregon has been running both reads out of the same formation with the running back almost always off-set about a yard behind Thomas.

(Note: The running back is almost always lined up off-set to one side of the quarterback. Sometimes in power sets there will be one lined up behind Thomas, but not often.)

Below is an example of what an inside zone read typically looks like:

Inside_zone_read_medium

As you can see, James is off-set to Thomas' right, about a yard behind him. The side he is lined up on is called the backside, while the other side (the side the play is designed to go to) is called the play-side. If Thomas gets the ball, he'll usually run inside the left tackle. That can cause defenses to overload to that side, creating holes elsewhere. This is exactly what the Ducks want because James has the ability to shift quickly and find those holes, or Chip Kelly will run a play out of the exact same formation designed to find one of those other holes.

Here's how the actual read works:

Inside_zone_read_2_medium

At the point of the handoff, Thomas is reading the backside defensive end. If the defensive end stays put (like he is here) then he hands the ball off to the running back. If the defensive end comes up to make a play on the running back, Thomas keeps the ball.

Making the correct reads is the most important job Thomas has and sometimes he struggles at this. Early in both the Stanford and USC games, he struggled with making the proper reads and the Ducks offense sputtered in the first quarter. In fact, this is a common theme for Oregon and if the Badgers can cause some confusion for Thomas early, the Wisconsin offense may be able to build an early lead.

Now let's look at the outside zone read:

Outside_zone_read_medium

I mentioned earlier that Oregon used to show the outside zone read before the snap with a different formation, but that has mostly changed based on what I watched. You'll see above that this formation is pretty much the same as the one they used on the inside zone read above. In this case, however, Oregon will pull the center and left guard (like Wisconsin loves to do) and the running back can bounce outside the tackle for a big gain. The play above went for a touchdown.

Of course, Oregon doesn't just run the ball all day. In fact, Thomas will throw a lot. And while Oregon's offense looks a lot different than the Badgers, the Ducks use the same basic concept: run the ball to set up the pass. A lot of Oregon's passing plays will look the exact same as the two runs I showed you above:

Zone_read_pass_medium

Thomas will fake the handoff to the running back and in this case, it sucked in the safety (circled) and dangerous true freshman wide receiver De'Anthony Thomas ran right up the middle of the field and was wide open for a touchdown.

This is the type of big play that should worry Badger fans. They've been pretty good against the run this season and have faired much better against option offenses than in the past, but they've had a number of coverage breakdowns leaving guys wide open. De'Anthony Thomas is a home run threat and the safeties have to keep him in front of them at all times.

What I've shown you above is just the basic idea of what Oregon runs. It's what you will see the most, but the idea of it is to set up other plays. At times you'll see two running backs in the backfield and they'll run some triple option and some power runs. They keep the defense guessing and they compound that by speeding things up and getting the defense tired.

If Wisconsin can get stops though, this plays directly into the Badgers hands. Oregon is dead last in time of possession and if UW can force three-and-outs, the Badgers can play their game and control the tempo.

Comment 6 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Oregon hasn't been as high powered as they've been...

but in large part that is because of continuity. Josh Huff had a stress facture from the beginning, Darron Thomas was out against part of ASU and all of the Colorado game but took time to regain his level of play and LMJ had that terrible elbow injury.

The defense has been even more banged up, which has some affect on the offense.

Huff needs to be a big part of the offense. De’Anthony leads the team in catches and that is not a good thing. Huff is our only burner in the receiver corp and hopefully he will stretch Wisconsin vertically. He was coming into form at the end of the season.

As a Duck fan, I am excited to see this team with some time to heal. This should be the freshest we’ve been since we had so many casualties in Fall Camp.

"I love Oregon's obsolete recruiting report on an unhealthy level. Just more proof how balla Chip Kelly really is." Dr. Saturday

by BisonDucks on Dec 30, 2011 1:37 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

Disagree with #1

They scored more points and gained more yards this season than we did, so I don’t see how anyone can claim they’re not extremely high-powered.

As for complexity: the formations are pretty simple. Beating them is not. The zone read means that their O-line effectively gains an extra blocker. Since the goal of our defense is to defeat the blocks and tackle the ball carrier, our job just got a lot harder. Defenses tend to compensate by anticipating the play based on the formation, and that is when Oregon uses misdirection to make a long strike.

Oregon uses the man advantage extremely well, and their receivers are perhaps most valuable as downfield blockers. Plus, their O-line excels at getting outside to seal the corner. Remember how often Sparty got outside of our defense? Expect Oregon to try to do the same.

We are going to need to start fast and to put the hurt on their defense, so that our ability to control the clock becomes an asset.

by brooks.wesley on Dec 30, 2011 2:50 PM CST reply actions  

If you'd like to learn more about the Oregon offense...

This is a great tutorial by FishDuck. Check out his tutorials, videos, and site for more information.

Inside Zone Read Tutorial

by RogerDuck on Dec 30, 2011 7:42 PM CST reply actions  

The Ducks will on occasion

read various linebackers or a tackle in a 4-3. They tried reading Nick Farley last year, but he was just too quick and was on Thomas and LMJ before they could even read him.

I’ve heard that Wisc O-linemen will pull a fair amount. Do you think Oregon’s more quick than big D-linemen will disrupt that? They can’t all be 6-6 330 and agile . . . right?

Good luck in the game, I’m looking forward to a home-and-home with the Badgers with the new conference alliance.

by AtticusDuck on Dec 30, 2011 8:01 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

O-linemen pulling

The O-line will be fine pulling against Oregon’s D-line assuming center Peter Konz plays and is 100%. He is probably the most agile center in the country and while the line is still good without him, the Badgers lose some flexibility with run-blocking schemes when he is out.

Bucky's 5th Quarter. SB Nation's Wisconsin Badgers community.

by Adam Hoge on Dec 30, 2011 10:17 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I hope Badgers have been practicing defending outside runs.

Because Michigan State was killing us with those. This seems to me to be an absolute key to the game with James on the other side.

by cloud of dust on Dec 31, 2011 9:14 AM CST via iPhone app reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the unofficial online tavern of the Wisconsin Badgers. Please seat yourself.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Help the Big 10 represent and beat the SEC!
182084_1735339457966_1072969434_1902860_5148352_n_small
Let's go Womens Hockey!
Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
Sam Dekker Can't Come Soon Enough

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


EDITORS

Rose_bowl_small Adam Hoge

Finley200x200_small Phil Mitten

Mcbain2_small Chuck Schwartz

331730_2218749040289_1594530234_32368362_792621393_o__1__small Sam Zastrow

CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS

002_small Jake Harris

Wisconsin_small Adam Tupitza

Img_2845_small Louis Bien

Rosebowl_small Nathan Palm