Why Michigan State Will Beat Wisconsin Saturday
When Wisconsin and Michigan State met earlier this season, I boldly wrote that the Badgers would win by 14 points.
Sure, I was very wrong, but in my effort to explain why Wisconsin would win, I also explained exactly how Michigan State could win.
I specifically pointed out two things the Spartans had to do to win:
1) Control the football and keep it away from the Badgers' prolific offense.
2) Dominate the line of scrimmage defensively.
And then, I wrote, the Spartans had to do even more.
Essentially, I built MSU's winning game-plan and then exclaimed it wouldn't work because Wisconsin was just too good.
Turns out, I was only wrong about the last part.
The Spartans won the time of possession 31:31-28:29 despite Wisconsin holding onto the football for over 10 minutes in the first quarter as it jumped out to a 14-0 lead. As soon as Michigan State took control of the ball, the Spartans grabbed the lead and forced the Badgers to stage a furious rally.
Michigan State also gave the Badger offensive line fits despite defensive end William Gholston missing the game due to suspension. The Spartans put more pressure on Russell Wilson than any other team Wisconsin faced this season and it showed as Wilson threw two of his three total interceptions against MSU and was also called for an intentional grounding in the end zone that led to safety.
But like I wrote, this wasn't enough. The Spartans still had to do more. They also blocked a field goal and a punt -- which they returned for a touchdown -- and then won the game on a ridiculous Hail Mary as time expired. They even got some help from Bret Bielema who called two questionable timeouts while the Badgers were on defense, giving the Spartans time for the Hail Mary.
When the game was over, I still thought Wisconsin was the better team and felt like they would beat Michigan State if they got a second chance in the Big Ten Championship Game.
Today, I still think Wisconsin is the better team, but I'm not convinced the Badgers will win Saturday.
Lost in UW's huge 45-7 win over Penn State last weekend was the fact that the Badgers' kick/punt coverage was still horrible and the secondary gave up another long touchdown pass.
These are the two areas that cost Wisconsin in both of their losses and despite spending a ton of time in practice trying to correct these two issues, neither one has improved all season.
At home, where the Badgers beat their seven opponents by an average of 40 points, these concerns were easy to ignore. Away from home, where the offense is still good, but not nearly as dominant, these concerns have been glaring and in two cases, cost Wisconsin wins.
Michigan State, in particular, has taken advantage of these deficiencies the last two seasons. Last year they beat Wisconsin with a punt return for a touchdown by Keshawn Martin and by converting big plays on third and fourth down. This year, they beat Wisconsin by blocking a punt for a touchdown and by converting big plays on third and fourth down. The Spartans were 8-of-16 on third down, including a touchdown on 3rd-and-11 and were 1-of-1 on fourth down, a 34-yard touchdown run by Martin.
There's also an issue on Wisconsin's offensive line. Center Peter Konz is trying to return from a dislocated ankle this weekend, but that appears to be a long-shot. And the UW line just hasn't been the same without him. Ryan Groy was a disaster at center two weeks ago and, after going back and watching the game over, it was evident he was overmatched at left guard last week against Penn State. The Spartans handled UW's offensive line last time when Konz was playing and Gholston wasn't. So what will happen with Konz out and Gholston in?
I also think the Spartans have more to play for in this game. They haven't played in a Rose Bowl since 1988, the same year most of Michigan State's seniors were born. The Badgers were in the Rose Bowl last year, and quite frankly, there still seems to be a cloud of disappointment hanging over the team and its fan base after the two heartbreaking losses earlier this season.
I'm not nearly as confident with this pick as I was last time -- and obviously I was very wrong last time -- but when I add it all together, I see Michigan State winning 31-28.
Don’t forget to show support for your favorite coach by voting him as the 2011 Liberty Mutual Coach of the Year at www.coachoftheyear.com.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Groy overmatched
Adam, while I find most of this article well thought out I have to pick a bone with you on your analysis of Ryan Groy last week. Like you I have watched this game more than once and I can NOT disagree with you more. Devon Still just won the Defensive MVP of the league correct? What was his stat line in the game last week? 2 tackles, .5 of a tackle for loss and a .5 of a sack. I highly doubt that Groy was dominated by the best d-lineman and defensive player in the conference with those kinds of stats. Look at the holes Ball had in the middle of the field. Sorry, you’re just flat wrong on this one.
Go back and watch the pass protection.
You are right that Groy’s run-blocking was just fine, but he was repeatedly pushed backward in pass protection.
Also, I should have mentioned he was guilty of a false start, which could be a problem in the dome.
Bucky's 5th Quarter. SB Nation's Wisconsin Badgers community.
Follow @B5Q
The setting will have an impact on this game, and it will only Help UW
Last time these two teams played was a Saturday Night in East Lansing. Gameday was in town and things were electric. Now while it looks as though not nearly as much Badgers fans will attend the game as we hoped, there will still be a substantial Wisconsin presence and this game cannot be considered a home game for anybody. That will have an impact.
I’m not confident in the special team still, obviously at times MSU Could bully us up front. Those things that killed us could all remain the same, but the setting will absolutely be different this time around and will undoubtedly help us this time.
Adam, you could have mentioned the fact
that MSU was not assessed one penalty for the entire game after averaging over 7 a game in their other Big Ten games.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog, and Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog
#FireCraigJames
Follow @GSchofield50
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 1, 2011 4:29 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Very key point
MSU played well but the refs allowed a LOT
Also, Wilson was not pressured when he missed Petersen twice for easy scores
I am glad B5Q is not predicting another blowout
by Big10freak on Dec 1, 2011 4:37 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
9 of the Badgers' 10 wins...
Were absolute blowouts, most by greater margins than we predicted.
None of us were over-the-top with our picks for the 11-point win at Illinois. While we all thought the Badgers would beat MSU and OSU, none of us called blowouts.
What exactly are you referring to?
-Jake Harris
I'm nervous as can be
Because you are right about the spec teams coverage as well as communication in the secondary. I’m surprised Penn State didn’t score over 20 despite our defense playing well, because PSU always had excellent starting field positon. I think it being on a neutral site rather than @MSU certainly helps and could be the difference in the game.
If I had to make a prediciton, I would have to say we squeak it out be 4, 31-27, only because like I said it’s neutral rather than @MSU. The only game I thought we would lose is @Illinois, because we were reeling, it’s a tough atmosphere and running QBs give us fits. But a neutral game w/ a lot of confidence, offense was unstoppable against a solid Defense, and assuming there isn’t another hail mary for MSU, I say we win by 4.
Montee Ball for Heisman.
Tajh Boyd and Dre' Ellington are the future.
Should be a hell of a game
Full disclosure: MSU fan and grad
Basically I feel like these teams are pretty well matched. UW offense is way out in front of MSU. The MSU D has a bit of an edge, though not as large as UW’s edge in offense, but MSU also seems to have a sizable edge in Special Teams.
These kind of matchups always make me super nervous, because special teams is easily the highest variance aspect of the game of football, and you can do everything “right” in that phase and still not necessarily come away with points (though ideally you are putting additional pressure on the opposing offense/defense).
In the end I feel likeMSU needs to play another clean game (not no penalties, but 35-40 yards) and MSU’s special teams need to create 4-7 points for us to get the repeat victory. Doable? Sure, but if not, then Bucky is going to the granddaddy again.
A level-headed MSU fan!
I agree completely with this characterization. I think it’ll be a tough game. Special teams will be an adventure and I think it inappropriately disrespects MSU to chalk up their success in that facet of the game purely to luck, as some have done. MSU was lucky in other ways but this wasn’t one of them.
by cloud of dust on Dec 2, 2011 10:40 AM CST via iPhone app up reply actions
Questions from a Spartans fan
First of all, good luck tomorrow night, can’t wait for this game, should be great.
How many games has your starting center Konz missed? I thought I remember hearing that he hurt it in one of your final two games – did he miss more than just the pounding you put on Penn State?
On that note, how has the backup center looked? Have there been issues with the exchange when RW was under center with the backup, or do you guys run mostly shotgun, nullifying exchange issues?? This season at MSU, our #1 & #2 centers have both gone down (though the #1, Travis Jackson, is back & looking really good), which led to some “adventures” at the LOS.
Also, what’s the deal with Badgers ST miscues lately? The past two Wisc @ MSU games had major momentum swings on Badger fails – last season the Keshawn Martin kick return was as much bad coverage as a great KMart return, and this season, there were obviously the blocked punt & FG, though the FG was blocked by Jerel Worthy, a 300 lb + beast who has dominated more than one long snapper in his career.
And the author of this piece noted that a huge PSU return was one of it’s best plays vs. you guys.
Some teams/coaches heavily emphasize ST play, like Va Tech or Urban Meyer, while others seem to care little about the third part of a team, like RichRod. Does Bielma not put the same emphasis on that area??
Good luck again, but go green!
He missed the Illinois game and the Penn State one
Ryan Groy was the first backup. He had some trouble against the Illini, so they moved hum back to left guard and swapped in Travis Frederick. The running game has been a lot better with Frederick at center than with Groy, but Groy still looks a little vulnerable at guard.
Bucky's 5th Quarter The best site for Badger news on the web!
If it made sense, it wouldn't be the BCS.
by John Veldhuis on Dec 2, 2011 11:09 PM CST up reply actions

by 
























