Bucky's 5th Quarter: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeff Sullivan's MLB Trade Deadline Primer

Foregone conclusions, be damned! Scenarios abound for bowling Badgers

The way people in Madison are talking, we may as well forget about Big Ten football until the holiday season, when we anxiously pray for anything close to a return to respectability in bowl games.  Inevitably, the negative sentiment goes, our Midwestern teams will fail us again on the sunny stages, and we'll have nothing left to do but drown our sorrows in another stiff glass of egg nog.

Oh, you haven't heard?  It's a foregone conclusion.  Once Ohio State beats Iowa and its backup quarterback, James Vandenberg, Saturday, Wisconsin will essentially finish in fourth place in the conference, as far as bowl selection committees are concerned.  The Buckeyes will head to Pasadena, Iowa and Penn State will face SEC teams in the Capital One and Outback bowls and, in a cruel twist of fate, the Badgers will return to the Champs Sports Bowl, which this year makes its Big Ten selection before the Valero Alamo Bowl.  Hard-luck Wisconsin will revisit the site of its 42-13 defeat at the hands of Florida State, and a ten-win team will have nothing to show for its improvement of three victories over a season ago.  Even this very website has joined in on the doomsday forecasting, calling Orlando our "second home" as Badger fans.

Star-divide

Um, this is still college football we're talking about, right?  The sport in which anything - anything - can happen?  With two full weekends left of Big Ten play, and even more for the rest of the national contenders, how anyone can consider the ending already written for the Badgers is incredible.  Come to think of it, has much of anything happened the way we thought it would when it comes to sorting out the postseason mess in the BCS era?  I'm tempted to say I'd be more surprised if Wisconsin's season actually did end in exactly the way described above than if something entirely different were to happen.

Let's take a look at some of the premature assumptions that have been asserted as facts about how this Big Ten season will conclude:

1) The winner of the Iowa-Ohio State game Saturday will finish with one conference loss and win the Big Ten outright.  The sole conference crown is not, by any means, a given for whichever team wins Saturday's showdown in Columbus.  If Ohio State wins, as predicted, the Buckeyes still need to go to Ann Arbor for their annual bloodbath with Michigan.  Michigan is 1-5 in Big Ten play; that's a fact.  It's also a fact that this is one of the most heated and tradition-rich rivalries in all of sports, a true "throw out the records" affair if there is one.  The mutual hatred between these teams is so deep that a victory over Ohio State would make a hellish season worth the trouble for many Michigan players and fans.  Wolverines defensive back Troy Woolfolk even shrugged off a question about his team's upcoming game against the Badgers, saying a win over the Buckeyes was the end-all, be-all for Michigan at this point.  Add to that the fact that the Wolverines may very well be playing for bowl eligibility in this game, if they lose to Wisconsin Saturday.  With the seat under head coach Rich Rodriguez getting warmer, Michigan will at least give Ohio State all it can possibly handle November 21, and it could mean the Buckeyes finish with two conference losses, even if they beat Iowa.

If the Hawkeyes pull off the upset Saturday, the scenario becomes even more favorable.  Iowa concludes its season against a decent Minnesota team and will still be playing its backup quarterback.  The Hawkeyes have already lost once at home under similar circumstances.  Who is to say it can't happen again?  And what if Iowa loses each of its next two games, a distinct possibility?  Suddenly, a 10-2 Badger team will have leapfrogged the Hawkeyes for third place.  Wisconsin fans know all too well how easily an undefeated start can turn sour, having watched a 9-0 team in 2004 drop its last two regular season games and then lose in the Outback Bowl to finish 9-3.

2) Penn State will win its last two games, finish in a tie with the Badgers at 10-2 and be selected ahead of Wisconsin.  Again, are we forgetting the nature of college football?  The Nittany Lions' last two games are against Indiana and Michigan State.  Indiana is 1-5, and Penn State gets them at home.  Still, give the Hoosiers a fighting chance.  They have held fourth-quarter leads in three opposing Big Ten venues this season and certainly gave Wisconsin a scare last week.  The finale at Michigan State is extremely intriguing.  Spartan Stadium can be a tough place to play, and this is a rivalry game.  The Spartans have caught some tough breaks this year, but there is no reason they cannot provide legitimate competition to Penn State. 

Have the Nittany Lions done anything that impressive this season?  Even with a record identical to that of the Badgers, I'm not ready to close the book on a bowl selection committee taking Wisconsin first.  If both squads win out, the teams will have lost to the same two opponents.  The difference might be that Penn State lost to both Iowa and Ohio State at home, whereas the Badgers had to travel to Columbus.  The Nittany Lions scored a combined 13 points in those losses.  Mock Wisconsin's non-conference schedule all you want, but Penn State's is actually worse.  Akron, Syracuse, Temple and Eastern Illinois, all at home?  At least the Badgers played Fresno State, travel to Hawaii and beat a better MAC team in Northern Illinois.  On paper, Wisconsin's resume is better.

3) Wisconsin has no chance of obtaining an at-large BCS bid, nor does any team from the Big Ten.  This one makes me laugh.  It's as if the perception of the Big Ten being relatively weak is a concept introduced this season.  People have been ridiculing the conference for years, yet it still consistently receives two bids in BCS games.  Call it one of the system's many flaws if you want but, last I checked, the system will again be used this winter.  There are a number of reasons the Big Ten routinely sneaks an extra team in.  A big part of it has to do with tradition, prestige and fan bases.  Within some loose restrictions, the bowl selection committees can pretty much choose any contenders they want to fill at-large slots.  These committees look at Ohio State, Iowa, Penn State and Wisconsin, and they see dollar signs.  If any of those four teams are on the table and there is any way of justifying it, I would bank on one being taken.  These universities have huge alumni networks, rabid fan bases and an impressive record of traveling to bowl destinations and producing monster TV ratings.  If it's a tossup between a Big Ten team and, say, TCU, I think we know who wins that battle.

But the real advantage is one the Big Ten will be enjoying for the final time this year, and that is its early conclusion.  Yes, you read that right.  The conference finishing play one or even two weeks before the rest of college football has long been blamed for its poor performance in bowl games.  However, it unquestionably helps the Big Ten when it comes to BCS bowl selection.  Come November 21, other top teams will have to maintain their winning ways and prevail in difficult conference championship games.  Big Ten teams will sit back, relax and watch the others lose their grips on the bids.  Consequently, by remaining idle, they will rise in the BCS standings and take the spots of the losing teams.  There is very little to gain and a whole lot to lose by playing later in the season.  The BCS tends to view late-season losses very unfavorably, while rewarding teams whose defeats are less fresh in the minds of fans and pollsters.  Is it fair?  Absolutely not.  But the point is that teams similar to Wisconsin record-wise, like USC, LSU, Miami, Notre Dame, TCU and Boise State will all have opportunities to lose conference games, while the Badgers will have wrapped up their slate.

4) The Badgers will win the remainder of their games and finish 10-2.  Now that I've given everyone diabetes with all of this optimism, the reality still remains that Wisconsin could very easily drop one or more of its remaining games.  Michigan is desperate for a victory to become bowl-eligible.  And that trip to Evanston to face a decent Northwestern team is always daunting for the Badgers.  Hawaii comes with its share of distractions.  In order for any of the above scenarios to become realistic for Wisconsin, the team must take care of its own business and defeat the very beatable opponents left on its schedule.

 

-Jake Harris

0 recs  |  Comment 7 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Point of contention

Please explain to me how Wisconsin beat a better MAC team than Penn State? Penn State beat Temple who is undefeated in the MAC and has a win over Navy. Northern Illinois lost to Toledo, who lost to Temple.

PSU and Wisconsin may finished tied in the league, but I don’t think any bowl selection panel is going to be blown out of the water by Fresno State, Wofford, and Northern Illinois. At least Penn State played a BCS school.

Ultimately, if PSU and Wisconsin are tied, I think PSU would get the nod just due to their gigantic fan base that loves to travel. Cash is king.

by BSD on Nov 12, 2009 9:09 AM CST reply actions  

Who cares who beat who?

Both teams won all their non-conference games, but I’m not sure why you are dismissing Fresno State. The Bulldogs are much better than Syracuse so the fact PSU played a BCS school is irrelevant.

Also, Wisconsin’s fan base brings in just as much cash as Penn State’s. Assuming UW isn’t headed to Orlando again, Badger fans travel just like Penn State’s and Ohio State’s fans.

Bucky's 5th Quarter. SB Nation's Wisconsin Badgers community.

by Adam Hoge on Nov 12, 2009 12:15 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll concede the first point...

I actually, no joke, forgot that Temple moved to the MAC. They are, indeed, a better MAC team than NIU. I was referring to Akron when I said Wisconsin had a better victory there.

If both of these teams finish 10-2, I would still make the argument that Wisconsin should go ahead of Penn State. By virtue of beating Fresno State and traveling to Hawaii, the Badgers have the superior non-conference schedule.

Both teams lost to Iowa and Ohio State, but the Nittany Lions dropped both at home and scored a combined 17 points in the defeats. In 120 minutes of football in your own backyard, that is pathetic. At least the Badgers traveled to Columbus.

In Big Ten play, Penn State and Wisconsin basically played the same teams. The only difference is Wisconsin beat Purdue, while PSU won the lottery and got to play Illinois. Despite how bad the Boilermakers looked in their trip to Madison, they are better than the Illini.

If Penn State gets selected before Wisconsin, it will be because of a combination of starting higher in the preseason rankings and the national appeal of Joe Paterno. There is no football argument that supports such a decision.

-Jake Harris

by Jbharris87 on Nov 12, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll be honest

I have seen much of Wisconsin this year. I have tough time believing that you guys caught all the way up to us from last year. If our kids win out, and admittedly based on nothing more than my eyeballs and prejudice, I think Penn State is probably still the superior team. My guess is that will be the media/bowl selection committee’s prospective as well.

 I’m not sure that a determination of who’s lousy non-confrence shcedule is worse adds a whole lot to the debate.

It will wind up being a beauty contest. I suspect Penn State wins it, regardless of the relevant football arguments. Penn State brings a sexier team, that will be the difference.

Beat Indiana, I guess.

by jesse. on Nov 12, 2009 2:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Spartan Stadium can be a tough place to play, and this is a rivalry game

It is? I know they hand out a trophy at the end of it, but it’s hardly Army/Navy out there.

Spartan Stadium is a tough place to play, and this game certainly has the potential to be strange.

Beat Indiana, I guess.

by jesse. on Nov 12, 2009 11:58 AM CST reply actions  

They play the last weekend of the season every year...

And, as you mentioned, it’s a trophy game.

Rivalry aside, would it really be a stunning upset if Michigan State won at home? That was more my point.

-Jake Harris

by Jbharris87 on Nov 12, 2009 2:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Stunning Upset?

No.

But that trophy has nothing to do with it.

Beat Indiana, I guess.

by jesse. on Nov 12, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the unofficial online tavern of the Wisconsin Badgers. Please seat yourself.
Start posting about the Badgers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Badgers Basketball Schedule

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo +14 updates

QB Jeremiah Masoli Headed To Ole Miss After Being Dismissed From Oregon

Photo

With Apologies To Randy Edsall, The Big East Remains Mostly Harmless

FILE -- This is an Oct. 18, 2008 file photo showing Connecticut corner back Jasper Howard (6) trying to get the crowd into the game during the fourth quarter of an NCAA college football game against Rutgers, in Piscataway, N.J.   Jasper Howard had his little sisters' names tatooed on his chest. His friends say it was a constant reminder of why he was at U Conn _ to provide his family with a better life than the one he had in Miami's Little Haiti. (AP Photo/Mel Evans, File) link

In Defense Of Big East Football

More from SBNation.com >


EDITOR

With_ball_small Adam Hoge

CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS

Small Jbharris87

Wisconsin_small AdamT

Mebadgerhat_small drumbum2011